The long-awaited move towards insurance parity for AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) treatments has encountered significant hurdles, raising concerns over its seamless implementation in the Indian healthcare ecosystem
While there has been growing advocacy for including AYUSH therapies in mainstream health insurance policies, the journey has been marked by various challenges that continue to complicate the integration of traditional healthcare with the insurance sector
The Promise of AYUSH and Its Growing Popularity
AYUSH treatments, which include centuries-old practices like Ayurveda and Siddha, have long been integral to India’s healthcare landscape. With a growing interest in holistic, non-invasive, and natural therapies, AYUSH has garnered immense popularity not just in India, but across the globe. As a result, there is a demand for insurance coverage that acknowledges these treatments as legitimate and viable alternatives to conventional allopathic care.
The Government of India, through the Ministry of AYUSH, has actively promoted these therapies. However, despite policy advancements, health insurance companies have been slow to include AYUSH under the umbrella of medical coverage.
The Roadblocks to Insurance Parity
-
Lack of Standardized Protocols
One of the major roadblocks in integrating AYUSH treatments into insurance policies is the absence of standardized treatment protocols. Unlike allopathic medicine, which has well-established diagnostic and treatment guidelines, AYUSH practices can vary significantly across practitioners, regions, and even the type of therapy offered. Insurers often hesitate to cover treatments without clearly defined outcomes and universally accepted standards.
Dr. Arun Mehta, a leading healthcare analyst, explains, “In insurance, the risk factor is crucial. When treatments lack clear protocols and outcomes, it’s challenging for insurers to quantify risks, which in turn, makes them reluctant to include AYUSH.“
-
Quality Assurance Concerns
While AYUSH therapies are rooted in ancient practices, the lack of a rigorous quality control framework often raises concerns. Health insurers typically require assurance that treatments are safe, reliable, and consistently effective. The absence of formal accreditation or regulatory bodies for many AYUSH therapies leaves insurers wary of covering them, fearing a rise in fraudulent claims or unqualified practitioners.
“There’s a gap between the potential of AYUSH and the systems in place to safeguard its quality,” says Neha Kapoor, a senior insurance advisor. “Until this gap is bridged, insurers will remain hesitant.”
-
Regulatory Challenges
In India, while the Ministry of AYUSH regulates the practice of traditional medicine, it does not have the same weight as the Medical Council of India for allopathic treatments. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has yet to fully align its regulations with the growing need for integrating AYUSH in health insurance policies.
Though some insurers have begun piloting AYUSH-inclusive plans, the regulations governing these plans remain vague and unstructured. This ambiguity in governance makes it difficult for both providers and consumers to fully embrace AYUSH insurance coverage.
-
Financial Viability for Insurers
From a financial standpoint, the high volume of claims associated with prolonged AYUSH treatments, especially in chronic disease management, poses a risk. Treatments such as Panchakarma (Ayurvedic detoxification), homeopathy, and naturopathy often span several weeks or even months, which could increase the financial burden on insurers.
Rajeev Reddy, CEO of a major insurance company, commented, “The cost-effectiveness of AYUSH treatments remains under debate. While these treatments are popular, their prolonged nature could lead to higher claims ratios, making them less attractive for insurance providers.”
-
Public Awareness and Cultural Bias
Cultural biases favoring allopathic medicine remain another significant barrier. Despite the widespread use of AYUSH therapies in India, many people still perceive them as complementary rather than mainstream healthcare solutions. This lack of mass awareness about the benefits of traditional medicine contributes to insurers’ reluctance in offering coverage.
Dr. Priya Sharma, a leading practitioner of Ayurveda, believes that greater awareness campaigns could help shift public perception. “There’s a deep-rooted belief in modern medicine as the ‘only’ legitimate form of treatment. We need public education to make people understand that AYUSH has its own merits, which can be effectively covered by insurance.”
Progress on the Horizon?
Despite these challenges, there is a growing push from both the public and private sectors to bridge the gap. The National AYUSH Mission has been calling for stronger regulatory measures, and some private health insurance companies have already started pilot schemes offering limited coverage for AYUSH treatments.
The government’s efforts to standardize AYUSH therapies, particularly through certification bodies and licensing systems, may also help in mitigating quality concerns. Moreover, more data is needed to establish the long-term cost-effectiveness of AYUSH treatments, which could persuade insurers to include these therapies under their umbrella.
Looking Ahead
As the demand for integrated healthcare continues to rise, insurance parity for AYUSH treatments may soon become a reality—though not without significant effort. Whether the challenges can be overcome will depend on collaborative efforts between government bodies, insurers, healthcare providers, and the general public.
Dr. Mehta concludes, “The road ahead is challenging, but not impossible. As more research is conducted on the efficacy of AYUSH treatments, and as quality standards are developed, we may see a tipping point where traditional medicine gains its rightful place in mainstream insurance.”
For now, the future of insurance parity for AYUSH treatments remains uncertain, but hope lingers as all parties involved push forward for a more inclusive healthcare system.